On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 15:22 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:19:01PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 13:24 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > + <change>
> > + <summary>
> > + libxml: min required libxml is now 2.9.1
> > + </summary>
> > + <description>
> > + Support for building with libxml versions older than 2.9.1
> > + has been dropped.
> > + </description>
> > + </change>
>
> I don't think we need to document this in the release notes: for
> starters, configure will already complain loudly if libxml on the
> host is too old, same as it does for any other dependency, and
> additionally the version bump is fully in line with our established
> platform support policy.
I don't agree. This is something I expect to be prominent in any
application's release notes or news. There's no downside to giving
users this information upfront.
We have traditionally not done this but alright, I can see how it
could be helpful in some scenarios.
Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
and safe for freeze.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization