On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:35:19PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino(a)redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, 23 May 2014 00:50:38 -0300
> Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> > Then the guest triggers an RTC update, so qemu sends an event, but the
>> > event is lost. Then libvirtd starts again, and doesn't realize the
>> > event is lost.
>>
>> Yes, but that case is also true for any other QMP asynchronous event,
>> and therefore should be handled generically i suppose (QMP channel data
>> should be maintained across libvirtd shutdown). Luiz?
>
> Maintaining QMP channel data doesn't solve this problem, because all sorts
> of race conditions are still possible. For example, libvirt could crash
> after having received the event but before handling it.
>
> The most reliable way we found to solve this problem, and that's what we
> do for other events, is to allow libvirt to query the information the event
> is reporting. An event is nothing more than a state change in QEMU, and QEMU
> state is persistent during the life time of the VM, so we allow libvirt to
> query the state of anything that may send an event.
In fact, this is a general rule: when libvirt tracks an event, it also
needs a way to poll for the information in the event.
I see.
This also seems pretty harmful wrt losing events:
/* Global, one-time initializer to configure the rate limiting
* and initialize state */
static void monitor_protocol_event_init(void)
{
/* Limit RTC & BALLOON events to 1 per second */
monitor_protocol_event_throttle(QEVENT_RTC_CHANGE, 1000);
Better remove it.