Laszlo Ersek <lersek(a)redhat.com> writes:
On 04/23/18 11:50, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Laszlo Ersek <lersek(a)redhat.com> writes:
>
>> Now that we have @SysEmuTarget, it makes sense to restict
>> @TargetInfo.@arch to valid sysemu targets at the schema level.
>
> We could mention that supported targets become visible in QMP
> introspection. But I can't see what QMP clients could do with this
> information, so let's not bother.
>
>>
>> Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: David Gibson <dgibson(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> RFCv3:
>>
>> - The patch is new in this version. [Markus]
>>
>> qapi/misc.json | 6 ++++--
>> arch_init.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/qapi/misc.json b/qapi/misc.json
>> index 5636f4a14997..3b4fbc534089 100644
>> --- a/qapi/misc.json
>> +++ b/qapi/misc.json
>> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>> # = Miscellanea
>> ##
>>
>> +{ 'include': 'common.json' }
>> +
>> ##
>> # @qmp_capabilities:
>> #
>> @@ -2449,12 +2451,12 @@
>> #
>> # Information describing the QEMU target.
>> #
>> -# @arch: the target architecture (eg "x86_64", "i386", etc)
>> +# @arch: the target architecture
>> #
>> # Since: 1.2.0
>> ##
>> { 'struct': 'TargetInfo',
>> - 'data': { 'arch': 'str' } }
>> + 'data': { 'arch': 'SysEmuTarget' } }
>>
>> ##
>> # @query-target:
>> diff --git a/arch_init.c b/arch_init.c
>> index 6ee07478bd11..4367f30291f8 100644
>> --- a/arch_init.c
>> +++ b/arch_init.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>> #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
>> #include "hw/audio/soundhw.h"
>> #include "qapi/qapi-commands-misc.h"
>> +#include "qapi/error.h"
>> #include "qemu/config-file.h"
>> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>> #include "hw/acpi/acpi.h"
>> @@ -111,8 +112,23 @@ int xen_available(void)
>> TargetInfo *qmp_query_target(Error **errp)
>> {
>> TargetInfo *info = g_malloc0(sizeof(*info));
>> + Error *local_err = NULL;
>>
>> - info->arch = g_strdup(TARGET_NAME);
>> + /*
>> + * The fallback enum value is irrelevant here (TARGET_NAME is a
>> + * macro and can never be NULL), so simply pass zero. Also, the
>
> We pass -1 in similar cases elsewhere.
>
>> + * lookup should never fail -- if it fails, then @SysEmuTarget needs
>> + * extending. Catch that with an assertion, but also handle it
>> + * gracefully, in case someone adventurous disables assertions.
>> + */
>> + info->arch = qapi_enum_parse(&SysEmuTarget_lookup, TARGET_NAME, 0,
>> + &local_err);
>> + g_assert(!local_err);
>> + if (local_err) {
>> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>> + qapi_free_TargetInfo(info);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>
> Simpler:
>
> info->arch = qapi_enum_parse(&SysEmuTarget_lookup, TARGET_NAME, 0,
> &error_abort);
OK, I'll use this form -- but should I use -1 or 0, after all, for
default value?
I count more than a dozen instances of -1, and none of zero. Please use
-1.