libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-04-03 00:34:25:

> GY>   With the changed indication_tester, I think maybe it's better to
> GY>   resubmit this set. Of course, the same as former.
>
> Okay, I copied the indication_tester.py into the library and was able
> to run the indication test successfully.  Very cool.
>
> What are your plans for other indication tests?  We definitely need to
> test at least all three of the lifecycle indications in the positive
> case.
>
  As you said before, it's better to subscribe to a superclass and
  get all three of the lifecycle indications. So I prepare to
  change the test case do the setup for each type in a single file.
  Also, the superclass named "CIM_Indication", right?

 
> How about a test that subscribes to a Xen indication and then creates
> a KVM guest to make sure that it doesn't get the KVM indication?
>
  You refer to the negative test case to Xen indication?

> --
> Dan Smith
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> Open Hypervisor Team
> email: danms@us.ibm.com
> [attachment "attjivxz.dat" deleted by Guo Lian Yun/China/IBM]
> _______________________________________________
> Libvirt-cim mailing list
> Libvirt-cim@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim